There's nothing inherently wrong with viewing images like this tornado in Moore, OK, but..... |
And this storm has nothing to do with wind, rain, snow or destruction. But maybe it does have a little to do with hot air. Or not. You decide.
What precipitated (ha!) this latest kerfuffle among weather geeks was a recent article by David Bauder, a television writer for the Associated Press.
He noted that the evening news, and lots of other news sources are loaded up with weather stories.
This, Bauder seemed to argue, had as much to do with ratings as news value. After all, people are attracted to dramatic images of extreme weather. Weather porn, if you will.
I've always freely admitted that some of what I post on this here weather and climate blog thingy is weather porn.
Hey, I'm just as much a fan of weather porn as the next guy or gal, even as I know I also have a responsibility to offer sober stuff, non-hyped stuff, not sensationalism
I really don't see the harm in weather porn, at least in moderation.
What really drew a negative reaction, and I can see why, is a source for Bauder's story characterized ABC News meteorologist Ginger Zee as a "pornographer."
Here's news consultant Andrew Tyndall, quoted in Bauder's piece:
"If Ginger Zee reported in the role of climatologist rather than meteorologist, I would praise ABC's 'World News Tonight's' decision as a daring intervention into a crucial national and global debate.....Instead, she is more like a pornographer."
I, as a weather geek and journalist, and many outspoken meteorologists, have real problems with Tyndall's quote.
First of all, Ginger Zee has proven herself to be a highly capable, accurate and good meteorologist and journalist.
Also, implicit in the Tyndall quote is an assumption that maybe every news story that even touches on weather ought to be sounding alarms on global warming.
.....when we're done watching the dramatic tornado video, it's time to help people like this. (Photo by Sue Ogrocki, AP) |
It's true journalists really have a duty to spread as much accurate information on climate change as possible.
But not every news story, not every weather story warrants an exhaustive examination of global warming.
If a storm is an immediate threat, if a tornado, hurricane, flood, blizzard, snow storm, ice storm, cold snap or heat wave is threatening a city, a region or a country, those potentially affected want to know what's up with this particular crisis. And how to protect themselves.
One the storm passes, that would be a good time to examine whether global warming had a role in the disaster or really bad weather.
Additionally, it's a necessary public service when people like Ginger Zee describe for us the implications and hazards of a storm or extreme weather.
That said, it's also true that TV networks and other media outlets love, LOVE showing footage of extreme weather. Frankly so do I.
I openly refer to wild, dramatic videos and photos of tornadoes, hurricanes and the like as "weather porn." People get off on it. I do, too.
Of course, this enthusiasm for "weather porn" gives me some serious pangs of guilt, and should for everyone who enjoys weather porn.
The people who were killed in that storm left behind grieving loved ones. The houses that were destroyed belonged to someone. The lives that were uprooted by the severe weather will never be the same.
I like to think our addiction to weather porn has a good side. That maybe it inspires us to help those who were victimized by dangerous weather. That it makes us lobby for better structural standards, and zoning to keep people from building in hazardous places.
I'd also like to think all these images of severe weather prompts us to become activists against climate change.
That's the hope, anyway.
The power of nature is thrilling, awe-inspiring, deadly, tragic and incredibly vivid. I will continue to be a fan of weather porn, and I'm sure a lot of other people will, too.
I just hope we don't sit back and do nothing once we've finished watching that video of an EF-5 tornado destroy a pleasant Great Plains small town.
No comments:
Post a Comment